Sep-27-2021, 03:18 AM
(Sep-27-2021, 02:23 AM)knight2000 Wrote: The reason I changed the code in the end to include the additional div (unlike the original code), was because snippsat educated me that I shouldn't be using 'soup' in a 'for loop'.Previously you said:
(Sep-26-2021, 04:24 AM)knight2000 Wrote: 1 instance where there is no record of the objectBut at that point there was no explanation of the requirements for that. The point I am trying to make is that for the future it helps to provide details like that. As best as I understand, the loop you had would have found all items except the one.